Is a squatter a tenant — and what rights do they have?
No. The removal law North Carolina passed in 2025 calls them an 'unauthorized person' — no lease, no rent ever paid, no claim to the place — and says in as many words that this is not a tenant. The ordinary eviction case is written for tenants, and owners who file it against a squatter are told in small claims court that it does not fit.
›Read the law — 3 provisions
If a trespasser counts as a tenant, the owner is routed into housing court and every fast option closes.
1 · N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-159.50(7), enacted by S.L. 2025-88 (S.B. 55), eff. 2025-12-01
“Unauthorized person. – A person or persons occupying residential property who has no legal claim to the property, is not entitled to occupy it under a valid rental agreement or contract for deed, has not paid any rent or other form of payment to the property owner or an authorized representative of the property owner in connection with the occupancy of the property, and is not otherwise authorized to occupy the property. This term does not include a tenant who holds over after the lease term has expired under G.S. 42-26.”
Quoted from the enrolled session law on the General Assembly's own server. Read the last sentence: a holdover tenant is NOT an unauthorized person, so the fast track is closed against anyone who ever had a lease.
Read it at the source →2 · N.C. Gen. Stat. § 42-26(a) — tenant holding over may be dispossessed
“Any tenant or lessee of any house or land, and the assigns under the tenant or legal representatives of such tenant or lessee, who holds over and continues in the possession of the demised premises, or any part thereof, without the permission of the landlord, and after demand made for its surrender, may be removed from such premises in the manner hereinafter prescribed in any of the following cases: (1) When a tenant in possession of real estate holds over after his term has expired.”
3 · Melanie Crenshaw, 'Navigating North Carolina's New Expedited Removal Law', UNC School of Government (On the Civil Side), 2025-12-10, read 2026-07-14 · secondhand source
“Sometimes, the officer may instruct the property owner to file an action for summary ejectment, only for the property owner to learn in small claims court that this remedy is not available in situations where there is no landlord-tenant relationship.”
SECONDARY: a School of Government commentary post by a former magistrate, not the operative law. It is quoted because it describes the practical consequence the statute itself does not spell out.
Read it at the source →These are the provisions, in order. We have not drawn a conclusion from them — that is not ours to draw.