A charge that only supports a citation does not remove anyone from a house. This is the link that killed the previous market.
1 · Iowa Code § 716.7(2)(a)(2) (2026) — trespass defined
“Entering or remaining upon or in property without justification after being notified or requested to abstain from entering or to remove or vacate therefrom by the owner, lessee, or person in lawful possession, or the agent or employee of the owner, lessee, or person in lawful possession, or by any peace officer, magistrate, or public employee whose duty it is to supervise the use or maintenance of the property.”
The same subparagraph says how the notice may be given: "(a) The person has been notified to abstain from entering or remaining upon or in property personally, either orally or in writing, including by a valid court order under chapter 236. (b) A printed or written notice forbidding such entry has been conspicuously posted or exhibited at the main entrance to the property or the forbidden part of the property." And § 716.7(1)(a) defines the property it reaches: "“Property” shall include any land, dwelling, building, conveyance, vehicle, or other temporary or permanent structure whether publicly or privately owned."
Read it at the source →2 · Iowa Code § 716.8(1) (2026) — penalties
“Any person who knowingly trespasses upon the property of another commits a simple misdemeanor punishable as a scheduled violation under section 805.8C, subsection 12. A peace officer shall consider arresting and may arrest the person under section 805.9, subsection 3, paragraph “c”, if the person refuses to leave the property after receiving a citation or immediately returns to the property after receiving a citation, or may arrest the person as otherwise provided under law.”
Iowa's default penalty here is a citation, and a citation does not remove anyone from a house. The section names two things that change that — the person refuses to leave after being handed the ticket, or comes straight back — and on either of them the officer "shall consider arresting". Read the arrest statute at the next link.
Read it at the source →3 · Iowa Code § 805.9(3), chapeau and paragraph “c” (2026) — admission of scheduled violations
“When section 805.8 and this section are applicable but the officer does not deem it advisable to release the defendant and no court in the county is in session: … c. If the defendant does not comply with paragraph “a” or “b”, or when section 804.7 is applicable, the officer may arrest and confine the defendant if authorized by the latter section, and proceed according to chapter 804.”
The ellipsis skips paragraphs “a” and “b”, which describe the person mailing in an admission and the fine. The chapeau governs the whole of subsection 3, and it is a condition on the arrest paragraph, not a preamble to it: this is the track for when no court in the county is in session. We publish the condition and draw no conclusion from it. And § 805.1(1) runs the other way, subject to two exceptions it names: "Except for an offense for which an accused would not be eligible for bail under section 811.1 or a violation of section 708.11, a peace officer having grounds to make an arrest may issue a citation in lieu of making an arrest without a warrant or, if a warrantless arrest has been made, a citation may be issued in lieu of continued custody." The choice is the officer's, on both sides of it.
Read it at the source →4 · Iowa Code § 804.7(1)(a)–(c) (2026) — arrests by peace officers
“A peace officer may make an arrest under any of the following circumstances: a. For a public offense committed or attempted in the peace officer's presence. b. Where a public offense has in fact been committed, and the peace officer has reasonable grounds for believing that the person to be arrested has committed it. c. Where the peace officer has reasonable grounds for believing that an indictable public offense has been committed and has reasonable grounds for believing that the person to be arrested has committed it.”
Paragraph (a) is not limited by grade, so a simple misdemeanor in the officer's presence is within it on the face of the text. Whether a person living in a house the officer has just arrived at is committing the offence "in the peace officer's presence" is the question the whole encounter turns on, and it is not ours to answer. These are the provisions, in order. We have drawn no conclusion from them.
Read it at the source →5 · Iowa Code § 716.8(2) (2026) — penalties
“Any person committing a trespass as defined in section 716.7, other than a trespass as defined in section 716.7, subsection 2, paragraph “a”, subparagraph (6), which results in injury to any person or damage in an amount more than three hundred dollars to anything, animate or inanimate, located thereon or therein commits a serious misdemeanor.”
Read it at the source →6 · House File 2629, 91st G.A. — Reprinted, "As Amended and Passed by the House March 12, 2026"
“Sec. 3. Section 716.8, Code 2026, is amended by adding the following new subsection: NEW SUBSECTION. 9. a. A person committing a trespass as provided in section 716.7, subsection 2, paragraph “a”, subparagraph (2A), commits the following: (1) For a first offense, a serious misdemeanor. (2) For a second offense, an aggravated misdemeanor. (3) For a third or subsequent offense, a class “D” felony.”
READ THE BILL, NOT THE HEADLINE. HF 2629 is the Judiciary Committee's successor to HF 981, the "Stop Squatters Act" — and it is a different animal, which is the point of the next answers on this page. It adds "squatting" to § 716.7 as a new subparagraph (2A) and grades it above the scheduled-violation track. It creates NO removal power. STATUS AS OF 2026-07-14, from the Legislature's own bill history: passed the House 2026-03-12 (yeas 89, nays 2); read first time in the Senate and referred to Judiciary 2026-03-16; Senate subcommittee recommended passage 2026-03-18. No Senate floor action of record follows. It is a bill, not law, and nothing on this page assumes it will become one.
Read it at the source →These are the provisions, in order. We have not drawn a conclusion from them — that is not ours to draw.