Law library

Squatters and vacant property in Iowa: what the law says

Iowa gives an owner a fast court case: you file, the hearing is set within about a week, and if you win, the court orders them out and an officer physically removes them three days later. A judge signs it; nobody is put out of an Iowa house on your sworn word alone. Trespass here is written as a ticketable offence first, so the officer at the door may hand the person a citation and leave them where they are. Every answer below is quoted from the section it came from. And note the clock that runs against you: if you know someone is in your building, the fast track closes thirty days after you knew. Do not wait to see what happens.

Every answer on this page is quoted from the statute it came from and linked to the source, so you can read the law yourself. Last checked against the statutes on 2026-07-14.

What to do now — this part is ours, not the law

There is no 30-day rule. Nobody becomes a tenant by standing in your house long enough — not in thirty days, not in ninety. They are not a tenant on day one and they are not a tenant on day ninety. What time does change is how hard they are to remove, and how much of your money it takes. That is a reason to move today, not a deadline you have already missed.

If someone is in the property right now

  1. Do not go in, and do not change the locks. It is the first thing everyone wants to do and it is how the owner becomes the defendant. Read that question above before you touch anything.
  2. Call the police non-emergency line. Ask them to look at it as a criminal trespass rather than a landlord–tenant dispute. Those are different outcomes and the words matter.
  3. Have your proof of ownership in your hand when they arrive — the deed, a recent tax bill, your ID. The officer's whole decision turns on whether he believes you own it.
  4. Photograph everything, and write down every date. When you last saw it empty. When you found them. What was said. Who you called, and when.
  5. Call a lawyer the same day. Not next week. The clock on every route above has already started.
The full checklist — what to record and what to ask →

If it has not happened yet

Everything on this page gets easier the earlier you do it. Photograph the property empty, keep the utility bills, and write down who is allowed inside — before you lock up and walk away. None of that is expensive. All of it is worth more than it looks at 2am.

The checklist for leaving a property vacant →

Is a squatter a tenant — and what rights do they have?

No — though Iowa never says it in a single sentence. Its landlord-tenant law defines a tenant as someone entitled to be there under a rental agreement, and its removal chapter puts a person who got in by force or stealth in a category of his own, separate from the two about a lessee. He is not a tenant because he has no agreement, not because a statute calls him a squatter.

Read the law — 2 provisions

If a trespasser counts as a tenant, the owner is routed into housing court and every fast option closes.

1 · Iowa Code § 562A.6(16) (2026) — "tenant" defined, Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Law

“Tenant” means a person entitled under a rental agreement to occupy a dwelling unit to the exclusion of another.

The same section defines the agreement it turns on, at § 562A.6(11): "“Rental agreement” means an agreement written or oral, and a valid rule, adopted under section 562A.18, embodying the terms and conditions concerning the use and occupancy of a dwelling unit and premises." An oral agreement counts — which is exactly what an intruder will claim, and there is nothing in the definition that requires it to be written down.

Read it at the source →

2 · Iowa Code § 648.1(1)–(3) (2026) — grounds for forcible entry and detainer

A summary remedy for forcible entry and detainer is allowable: 1. Where the defendant has by force, intimidation, fraud, or stealth entered upon the prior actual possession of another in real property, and detains the same. 2. Where the lessee holds over after the termination of the lease. 3. Where the lessee holds contrary to the terms of the lease.

Read what ground one is written about: POSSESSION, not title. It protects "the prior actual possession of another" and says nothing about who holds the deed. That cuts both ways, and the next answer is where it cuts.

Read it at the source →

These are the provisions, in order. We have not drawn a conclusion from them — that is not ours to draw.

Can I just change the locks?

No. Iowa gives the owner a court action, not a crowbar — a judgment first, then an officer. Lock someone out yourself and the law you would be suing under protects whoever was in the house first, not whoever holds the deed. There is no Iowa case saying you are safe, and the person who finds out will be the defendant.

Read the law — 3 provisions

Lawful in a handful of states, a crime in most. Getting this wrong turns the victim into the defendant.

1 · Iowa Code § 648.1(1) (2026) — forcible entry and detainer, ground one

Where the defendant has by force, intimidation, fraud, or stealth entered upon the prior actual possession of another in real property, and detains the same.

A CLAIM ABOUT OUR OWN SEARCH, NOT ABOUT THE LAW: on 2026-07-14 we read Iowa Code chapter 648 in full on the Legislature's own server and found no provision permitting an owner to remove an occupant, change a lock, or shut off a utility himself. We also looked for an Iowa appellate decision resolving whether § 648.1(1) is available to an occupant who never had a right to be there, and could not fetch one — CourtListener returned no readable opinion. We therefore quote no case and rely on none.

Read it at the source →

2 · Iowa Code § 562A.26 (2026) — tenant's remedies for landlord's unlawful ouster, exclusion, or diminution of service

If the landlord unlawfully removes or excludes the tenant from the premises or willfully diminishes services to the tenant by interrupting or causing the interruption of electric, gas, water, or other essential service to the tenant, the tenant may recover possession pursuant to section 648.1, subsection 1, or terminate the rental agreement and, in either case, recover the actual damages sustained by the tenant, punitive damages not to exceed twice the monthly rental payment, and reasonable attorney fees. If the rental agreement is terminated, the landlord shall return all prepaid rent and security.

Note the scope and note the cross-reference. The section speaks of a LANDLORD and a TENANT, and § 562A.6(16) makes a tenant someone with a rental agreement. But the remedy it hands the ousted tenant is to "recover possession pursuant to section 648.1, subsection 1" — the same force-or-stealth ground quoted above, which on its face protects actual possession rather than title. Whether an occupant with no agreement can reach the same ground is the question we could not answer from a case, and it is the question the reader is betting his liberty on if he acts.

Read it at the source →

3 · Iowa Code § 648.22 (2026) — judgment, execution, costs

If the defendant is found guilty, judgment shall be entered that the defendant be removed from the premises, and that the plaintiff be put in possession of the premises, and an execution for the defendant's removal within three days from the judgment shall issue accordingly, to which shall be added a clause commanding the officer to collect the costs as in ordinary cases.

Every act of removal in Iowa's chapter comes after a judgment and is carried out by an officer. Nothing in the chapter lets the owner do it himself — not the lock, not the utilities, not the belongings.

Read it at the source →

These are the provisions, in order. We have not drawn a conclusion from them — that is not ours to draw.

If police do act, what is the charge — and can they arrest for it?

Depends — and Iowa's default is a ticket, not an arrest. Knowingly trespassing is the lowest grade of misdemeanor here and the Code treats it like a parking fine. The same sentence tells the officer to consider arresting if the person refuses to leave after being cited, and Iowa lets an officer arrest for an offence committed in front of him. It goes up a grade if there is injury or more than three hundred dollars of damage. A citation leaves them in the house.

Read the law — 6 provisions

A charge that only supports a citation does not remove anyone from a house. This is the link that killed the previous market.

1 · Iowa Code § 716.7(2)(a)(2) (2026) — trespass defined

Entering or remaining upon or in property without justification after being notified or requested to abstain from entering or to remove or vacate therefrom by the owner, lessee, or person in lawful possession, or the agent or employee of the owner, lessee, or person in lawful possession, or by any peace officer, magistrate, or public employee whose duty it is to supervise the use or maintenance of the property.

The same subparagraph says how the notice may be given: "(a) The person has been notified to abstain from entering or remaining upon or in property personally, either orally or in writing, including by a valid court order under chapter 236. (b) A printed or written notice forbidding such entry has been conspicuously posted or exhibited at the main entrance to the property or the forbidden part of the property." And § 716.7(1)(a) defines the property it reaches: "“Property” shall include any land, dwelling, building, conveyance, vehicle, or other temporary or permanent structure whether publicly or privately owned."

Read it at the source →

2 · Iowa Code § 716.8(1) (2026) — penalties

Any person who knowingly trespasses upon the property of another commits a simple misdemeanor punishable as a scheduled violation under section 805.8C, subsection 12. A peace officer shall consider arresting and may arrest the person under section 805.9, subsection 3, paragraph “c”, if the person refuses to leave the property after receiving a citation or immediately returns to the property after receiving a citation, or may arrest the person as otherwise provided under law.

Iowa's default penalty here is a citation, and a citation does not remove anyone from a house. The section names two things that change that — the person refuses to leave after being handed the ticket, or comes straight back — and on either of them the officer "shall consider arresting". Read the arrest statute at the next link.

Read it at the source →

3 · Iowa Code § 805.9(3), chapeau and paragraph “c” (2026) — admission of scheduled violations

When section 805.8 and this section are applicable but the officer does not deem it advisable to release the defendant and no court in the county is in session: … c. If the defendant does not comply with paragraph “a” or “b”, or when section 804.7 is applicable, the officer may arrest and confine the defendant if authorized by the latter section, and proceed according to chapter 804.

The ellipsis skips paragraphs “a” and “b”, which describe the person mailing in an admission and the fine. The chapeau governs the whole of subsection 3, and it is a condition on the arrest paragraph, not a preamble to it: this is the track for when no court in the county is in session. We publish the condition and draw no conclusion from it. And § 805.1(1) runs the other way, subject to two exceptions it names: "Except for an offense for which an accused would not be eligible for bail under section 811.1 or a violation of section 708.11, a peace officer having grounds to make an arrest may issue a citation in lieu of making an arrest without a warrant or, if a warrantless arrest has been made, a citation may be issued in lieu of continued custody." The choice is the officer's, on both sides of it.

Read it at the source →

4 · Iowa Code § 804.7(1)(a)–(c) (2026) — arrests by peace officers

A peace officer may make an arrest under any of the following circumstances: a. For a public offense committed or attempted in the peace officer's presence. b. Where a public offense has in fact been committed, and the peace officer has reasonable grounds for believing that the person to be arrested has committed it. c. Where the peace officer has reasonable grounds for believing that an indictable public offense has been committed and has reasonable grounds for believing that the person to be arrested has committed it.

Paragraph (a) is not limited by grade, so a simple misdemeanor in the officer's presence is within it on the face of the text. Whether a person living in a house the officer has just arrived at is committing the offence "in the peace officer's presence" is the question the whole encounter turns on, and it is not ours to answer. These are the provisions, in order. We have drawn no conclusion from them.

Read it at the source →

5 · Iowa Code § 716.8(2) (2026) — penalties

Any person committing a trespass as defined in section 716.7, other than a trespass as defined in section 716.7, subsection 2, paragraph “a”, subparagraph (6), which results in injury to any person or damage in an amount more than three hundred dollars to anything, animate or inanimate, located thereon or therein commits a serious misdemeanor.

Read it at the source →

6 · House File 2629, 91st G.A. — Reprinted, "As Amended and Passed by the House March 12, 2026"

Sec. 3. Section 716.8, Code 2026, is amended by adding the following new subsection: NEW SUBSECTION. 9. a. A person committing a trespass as provided in section 716.7, subsection 2, paragraph “a”, subparagraph (2A), commits the following: (1) For a first offense, a serious misdemeanor. (2) For a second offense, an aggravated misdemeanor. (3) For a third or subsequent offense, a class “D” felony.

READ THE BILL, NOT THE HEADLINE. HF 2629 is the Judiciary Committee's successor to HF 981, the "Stop Squatters Act" — and it is a different animal, which is the point of the next answers on this page. It adds "squatting" to § 716.7 as a new subparagraph (2A) and grades it above the scheduled-violation track. It creates NO removal power. STATUS AS OF 2026-07-14, from the Legislature's own bill history: passed the House 2026-03-12 (yeas 89, nays 2); read first time in the Senate and referred to Judiciary 2026-03-16; Senate subcommittee recommended passage 2026-03-18. No Senate floor action of record follows. It is a bill, not law, and nothing on this page assumes it will become one.

Read it at the source →

These are the provisions, in order. We have not drawn a conclusion from them — that is not ours to draw.

What decides whether police arrest or walk away?

Permission — whether the officer believes the person inside had it. And to weigh that he has to know who could have given it, which means knowing who owns the building. Iowa's trespass section turns on notice from the owner or the person in lawful possession. Nothing in it tells the officer how to establish that the man on the phone is the owner.

DeedProof solves this

We verify you own the property and file your notarized statement where police can check it. How it works →

Read the law — 3 provisions

Every other question here is downstream of this one. The whole encounter, in one decision, made in a doorway in the dark.

1 · Iowa Code § 716.7(2)(a)(2) (2026) — the words the offence hinges on

Entering or remaining upon or in property without justification after being notified or requested to abstain from entering or to remove or vacate therefrom by the owner, lessee, or person in lawful possession, or the agent or employee of the owner, lessee, or person in lawful possession, or by any peace officer, magistrate, or public employee whose duty it is to supervise the use or maintenance of the property.

Read it at the source →

2 · Iowa Code § 648.1(1) (2026) — the ground an owner sues on

Where the defendant has by force, intimidation, fraud, or stealth entered upon the prior actual possession of another in real property, and detains the same.

A CLAIM ABOUT OUR OWN SEARCH, NOT ABOUT THE LAW: on 2026-07-14 we read Iowa Code chapter 648 in full, and §§ 716.7 and 716.8 in full, on the Legislature's own server. We looked for any provision telling a peace officer, a clerk or a judge how to establish that the person claiming to be the owner actually owns the building — a deed check, a recorder's lookup, a registry, anything. We found no such provision. Confirm it against the official Code before relying on it.

Read it at the source →

3 · House File 2629, 91st G.A. — Reprinted, "As Amended and Passed by the House March 12, 2026", proposed § 716.7(1)(00a)

“Lawful authority” means the ability of a person to produce a deed or mortgage statement in the person’s name, a lease agreement that includes the name and signature of the property owner or an authorized representative of the property owner, a valid written or electronic agreement or communication authorizing the person to enter upon the property, or a receipt or other reliable evidence of a rent payment made to the property owner or an authorized representative of the property owner dated within the last sixty days.

A forged lease is "a lease agreement that includes the name and signature of the property owner" until somebody establishes that it is not — and the bill names no one whose job that is at the door. It is a bill, not law; it passed the House 89–2 on 2026-03-12 and sits in the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Read it at the source →

These are the provisions, in order. We have not drawn a conclusion from them — that is not ours to draw.

What is the lawful way to get them out?

You sue, and Iowa’s fast track gets you a hearing in about a week. If you win, the court orders them out and an officer physically removes them three days later. But the clock runs against YOU: if you knew they were in there and did nothing for thirty days, the fast track shuts and you are in an ordinary lawsuit that takes months.

Read the law — 5 provisions

The route sets the real cost. A summary track is weeks; a full civil suit is months.

1 · Iowa Code § 648.3(1) (2026) — notice to quit

Before action can be brought under any ground specified in section 648.1, except section 648.1, subsection 1, three days’ notice to quit must be given to the defendant in writing. However, a landlord who has given a tenant three days’ notice to pay rent and has terminated the tenancy as provided in section 562A.27, subsection 2, or section 562B.25, subsection 2, if the tenant is renting the manufactured or mobile home or the land from the landlord, may commence the action without giving a three-day notice to quit.

The three-day notice to quit that a landlord must give a tenant is not a precondition to suing the person who got in by force or stealth. Read the second sentence as well: it exempts a landlord who has already served a three-day notice to pay rent and terminated the tenancy, so ground one is not the only case the section lets through without a notice to quit.

Read it at the source →

2 · Iowa Code § 648.5(1)(a) (2026) — venue, service, hearing

An action for forcible entry and detainer shall be brought in a county where all or part of the premises is located. Such an action shall be tried as an equitable action. Upon receipt of the petition, the court shall set a date, time, and place for hearing. The court shall set the date of hearing no later than eight days from the filing date, except that the court shall set a later hearing date no later than fifteen days from the date of filing if the plaintiff requests or consents to the later date of hearing.

The eight days are to the FIRST hearing, not to the end. § 648.5(7) sends a contested case onward: "At the hearing, except for actions commenced as a small claim action under chapter 631, the court shall determine whether a genuine issue of material fact exists in the action. If the court determines that a genuine issue of material fact exists, an evidentiary hearing on the petition shall be held and the court shall continue the hearing to a future date and issue all appropriate orders relating to discovery and trial preparation." The statute sets no outer limit on that future date.

Read it at the source →

3 · Iowa Code § 648.22 (2026) — judgment, execution, costs

If the defendant is found guilty, judgment shall be entered that the defendant be removed from the premises, and that the plaintiff be put in possession of the premises, and an execution for the defendant's removal within three days from the judgment shall issue accordingly, to which shall be added a clause commanding the officer to collect the costs as in ordinary cases.

Read it at the source →

4 · Iowa Code § 648.18 (2026) — possession — bar

Thirty days’ peaceable possession with the knowledge of the plaintiff after the cause of action accrues is a bar to this proceeding.

THIS IS THE SENTENCE ON THIS PAGE MOST LIKELY TO COST AN IOWA OWNER HIS SUMMER. It is three lines long, it sits near the end of the chapter, and it runs against the OWNER — the one person in the story who is not in the building. What "peaceable" and "knowledge" mean here is decided by courts, and we quote no case, so do not read this as legal advice about your own thirty days. Read it as a reason not to wait.

Read it at the source →

5 · Iowa Code § 646.2 (2026) — recovery of real property, parties

Any person having a valid subsisting interest in real property, and a right to the immediate possession thereof, may recover the same by action against any person acting as owner, landlord, or tenant of the property claimed.

And § 646.1 says how it is tried: "Actions for the recovery of real property shall be by ordinary proceedings, and there shall be no joinder and no counterclaim therein, except of like proceedings, and as provided in this chapter." Ordinary proceedings are the full civil track — no eight-day hearing, no summary anything.

Read it at the source →

These are the provisions, in order. We have not drawn a conclusion from them — that is not ours to draw.

How long does it take, and what does it cost?

Months, if they fight — the first hearing is inside eight days, but a real dispute of fact sends the case to a full evidentiary hearing on a date the statute does not cap, and a thirty-day delay by you closes the fast track altogether. Iowa does put its filing fees in the statute, which most states do not: one hundred and ninety-five dollars to file a petition, ninety-five in small claims. That is the smallest number in this case.

Read the law — 4 provisions

The two numbers every owner wants, and the one nobody warns them about: you do not get it back.

1 · Iowa Code § 648.5(1)(a) (2026) — the eight-day hearing

The court shall set the date of hearing no later than eight days from the filing date, except that the court shall set a later hearing date no later than fifteen days from the date of filing if the plaintiff requests or consents to the later date of hearing.

Read it at the source →

2 · Iowa Code § 648.5(7) (2026) — genuine issue of material fact

At the hearing, except for actions commenced as a small claim action under chapter 631, the court shall determine whether a genuine issue of material fact exists in the action. If the court determines that a genuine issue of material fact exists, an evidentiary hearing on the petition shall be held and the court shall continue the hearing to a future date and issue all appropriate orders relating to discovery and trial preparation.

A forged lease IS a genuine issue of material fact until somebody proves it is not. The statute puts no outer limit on the future date, and there is no dataset of Iowa continuances — a duration is not in the Code, and we do not publish numbers we cannot source.

Read it at the source →

3 · Iowa Code § 602.8105(1)(a) (2026) — fees for civil cases

Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, for filing and docketing a petition, one hundred ninety-five dollars. In counties having a population of ninety-eight thousand or over, an additional five dollars shall be charged and collected to be known as the journal publication fee and used for the purposes provided for in section 618.13.

This is the filing fee and nothing else. Service, the sheriff, and a lawyer are not in it, and Iowa's forcible-entry chapter provides for none of them in a fee we could quote. Every dollar figure on this site appears verbatim in a document we fetched, or it does not appear — and no other Iowa figure does.

Read it at the source →

4 · Iowa Code § 631.6(1)(a) (2026) — small claims fees

Fees for filing and docketing shall be ninety-five dollars.

Chapter 648 contemplates the small-claims route expressly — § 648.5(7) carves out "actions commenced as a small claim action under chapter 631" from the genuine-issue determination, and § 648.19(3) governs a joint filing. Which route fits a given case is a question for an Iowa lawyer, and it is not one we answer.

Read it at the source →

These are the provisions, in order. We have not drawn a conclusion from them — that is not ours to draw.

Can a sheriff remove them on the owner's affidavit alone, with no court?

No — a judge has to sign. Nobody is put out of an Iowa house on the owner's sworn word: you get a judgment, and an officer carries the removal out three days later. Iowa's legislature was asked for a police-removal-on-complaint route in 2025 and the committee cut that section out of the bill; what passed the House this March creates a crime, not a removal power, and it has not passed the Senate.

Read the law — 3 provisions

Where a state has passed this, it hands the owner the whole mechanism for free. This field tracks the existential risk.

1 · Iowa Code § 648.22 (2026) — judgment, execution, costs

If the defendant is found guilty, judgment shall be entered that the defendant be removed from the premises, and that the plaintiff be put in possession of the premises, and an execution for the defendant's removal within three days from the judgment shall issue accordingly, to which shall be added a clause commanding the officer to collect the costs as in ordinary cases.

A CLAIM ABOUT OUR OWN SEARCH, NOT ABOUT THE LAW: on 2026-07-14 we read Iowa Code chapter 648 in full on the Legislature's own server, looking for any provision letting a sheriff or a police officer remove an occupant on the owner's sworn statement or complaint, with no judgment. We found no such provision. Confirm it against the official Code before relying on it.

Read it at the source →

2 · Iowa Code § 648.1 (2026) — grounds for forcible entry and detainer

A summary remedy for forcible entry and detainer is allowable: 1. Where the defendant has by force, intimidation, fraud, or stealth entered upon the prior actual possession of another in real property, and detains the same.

"Summary" here means a fast court case — an eight-day hearing under § 648.5 — not a case without a court. The judge is the check, and § 648.5(7) is where he applies it.

Read it at the source →

3 · House File 981, 91st G.A. — Introduced 2025-03-31, "Stop Squatters Act", proposed Iowa Code § 648.24

For the immediate removal of an unauthorized occupant, a person may submit a complaint to remove the unauthorized person occupying real property to the police if the real property is located in a city, or the county sheriff if the property is located outside of a city, for a person that is unlawfully entering, remaining upon, or occupying real property

READ THE BILL, NEVER THE NUMBER — AND NEVER THE NICKNAME. Secondary summaries still describe the "Stop Squatters Act" as Iowa's police-removal law. What happened, from the Legislature's own bill-history pages, read 2026-07-14: HF 981 was introduced 2025-03-31 and referred to Judiciary; on 2026-02-19 it was renumbered as HF 2629 (a committee successor bill), and HF 981 itself was withdrawn on 2026-03-16. HF 2629 DOES NOT CONTAIN THIS SECTION. Its § 648.24 became "Unlawful squatting" — a criminal offence — and the House then replaced even that with an amendment (H-8200) that simply adds squatting to the trespass section and grades it. HF 2629 passed the House 2026-03-12, yeas 89, nays 2, went to Senate Judiciary on 2026-03-16, and its subcommittee recommended passage on 2026-03-18. No Senate floor action of record follows. Watch this space: a future Iowa bill could restore the removal section, and if one does, this answer changes.

Read it at the source →

These are the provisions, in order. We have not drawn a conclusion from them — that is not ours to draw.

How long before they can claim they own it?

Ten years — and note how Iowa writes it: as a deadline on YOUR lawsuit, not as a prize for theirs. An action to recover real property must be brought within ten years. The Code says that and stops; what someone must actually prove to take title from you is decided by Iowa courts, not by the statute, and we do not quote a court we could not read.

Read the law — 2 provisions

The thing an owner of an empty building actually fears. Pure state statute.

1 · Iowa Code § 614.1(5)(a) (2026) — limitations of actions; recovery of real property

Except as provided in paragraph “b”, those founded on written contracts, or on judgments of any courts except those provided for in subsection 6, and those brought for the recovery of real property, within ten years.

A CLAIM ABOUT OUR OWN SEARCH: the Code states the ten years and nothing else. Iowa's adverse-possession doctrine — what possession has to look like, and what the occupier must claim — is judicial, and on 2026-07-14 we could not fetch an Iowa appellate opinion to quote (CourtListener returned no readable text). We therefore state no elements. Do not read the bare ten years as the whole rule, and do not read it as a countdown that starts because a house sat empty. Ask an Iowa lawyer what the elements are.

Read it at the source →

2 · Iowa Code § 614.17A(1)–(2)(a) (2026) — claims to real estate after 1992

After July 1, 1992, an action shall not be maintained in a court, either at law or in equity, in order to recover or establish an interest in or claim to real estate if all the following conditions are satisfied: a. The action is based upon a claim arising more than ten years earlier or existing for more than ten years. b. The action is against the holder of the record title to the real estate in possession. c. The holder of the record title to the real estate in possession and the holder’s immediate or remote grantors are shown by the record to have held chain of title to the real estate for more than ten years. … The claimant within ten years of the date on which the claim arose or first existed must file with the county recorder in the county where the real estate is located a written statement which is duly acknowledged and definitely describes the real estate involved, the nature and extent of the right of interest claimed, and the facts upon which the claim is based.

The ellipsis joins subsection 1 to the first sentence of subsection 2(a), as printed. And read condition (b) closely before taking comfort from this section: it protects the record titleholder "in possession". A vacant building is the case where that condition is least obviously met, and whether it is met is not a question the text answers. This is a different doctrine from the ten-year limit above, and neither is a substitute for reading the case law we could not open.

Read it at the source →

These are the provisions, in order. We have not drawn a conclusion from them — that is not ours to draw.

This page is the law. What it costs you in Iowa — the filing fee, the sheriff’s bill, the months, and whether you ever see the money again.

Your deed proves you own it. It does not prove you never rented it.

That is the officer’s real question, and the lease in their hand does not contradict your deed. You can swear it is a forgery — but a statement you write the morning after, against a lease dated last year, is worth very little. The version that counts has to already exist.

How DeedProof verifies owners and files the affidavit in advance →

› Every source on this page (18)

DeedProof is not a law firm and this page is not legal advice. We cite primary sources; we do not interpret them for your situation. Laws change — confirm current requirements with the relevant government office or a licensed attorney.