Is a squatter a tenant — and what rights do they have?
No. Georgia puts them in a different chapter of the code from tenants — the one about intruders — and since 2024 living in someone else's building without permission is a crime. They get none of a tenant's protections, and the ordinary eviction statute is not written for them.
›Read the law — 3 provisions
If a trespasser counts as a tenant, the owner is routed into housing court and every fast option closes.
1 · O.C.G.A. § 16-7-21.1(a)(1) — unlawful squatting, added by HB 1017 (Georgia Squatter Reform Act), eff. 2024-04-24
“A person commits the offense of unlawful squatting when he or she enters upon the land or premises of another and resides on such land or premises for any period of time knowingly acting without the knowledge or consent of the owner, rightful occupant, or an authorized representative of the owner. For purposes of this Code section, the term 'resides' means to inhabit or live on or within any land or premises.”
Quoted from the enrolled Act as passed by the House and Senate, fetched from the Governor's own server. Note the element that matters: the offense turns on the OWNER'S consent. A tenant, by definition, has it.
Read it at the source →2 · O.C.G.A. § 44-11-30 as amended by HB 1017 — proceedings against intruders
“such land or tenement is in the hands of another named person who does not in good faith claim a right to such possession and yet refuses to abandon the same”
This sits in Title 44, Chapter 11 (ejectment and proceedings against intruders) — a different chapter entirely from Chapter 7, the landlord-and-tenant chapter. The separation is the point.
Read it at the source →3 · O.C.G.A. § 44-7-50(a) — demand for possession · secondhand source
“In all cases when a tenant holds possession of lands or tenements over and beyond the term for which they were rented or leased to such tenant…”
SECONDARY: the official Georgia Code is hosted behind LexisNexis, which blocks automated retrieval; this text was read on FindLaw and only the opening clause is quoted, because that clause is the whole point. A human should confirm it against the official code. We also could not verify the widely repeated claim that filing this action against a pure squatter invites dismissal — the statute is plainly written about tenants, but we found no Georgia appellate decision we could fetch that says so.
Read it at the source →These are the provisions, in order. We have not drawn a conclusion from them — that is not ours to draw.